Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index Doctor Who Club of Australia
THEY'RE BACK
Sunday July 13, 11am-6pm
Drummoyne RSL, 162 Victoria Rd Drummoyne (upstairs function room)
Adults $10, DWCA/FSF members $8, Children (under 15) $6, Concession discount of $1
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Primeval
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> A Holiday For The Doctor
Author Message
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:13 pm    Post subject: Primeval Reply with quote

Primeval is Doctor Who's rival on ITV.

Found out from an ad that Primeval is among the new shows to be shown on 9 this year.

It is also one of the shows that Michael Idato assesses in the SMH Guide but does not seem to be impressed with it:
"Primeval (Nine)

From the makers of Walking with Dinosaurs and (the slightly less thrilling) Prehistoric Park comes the television version of Jurassic Park III. (A chilling omen ... did someone say Tea Leoni?) Top visual effects and all that but surely the dinosaur thing has been well and truly pumped dry?"
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the trailer and it looks pretty good:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds41256.html
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ITV is backing Primeval with a heavyweight marketing campaign:
http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/media/article/627450/primeval-heavyweight-push-itv-takes-doctor-who/
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SFX's article on Primeval:
http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=sea_monsters_and_centipedes_in
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Comparisons between Primeval and Doctor Who have been made in the British press. Heat magazine said "...it's not a fair comparison - where Doctor Who is quirky, playful and very British, this glossy adventure is more in the American style, with spectacular effects, fancy locations and less larking about... For all it's slickness, Primeval would be improved by the presence of a David Tennant or a Billie Piper. But what wouldn't?". Closure magazine commented that as, "Doctor Who proved that decent sci-fi drama can be a huge family hit, so you can't blame ITV for wanting a piece of the action."
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 889
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Theta Sigma wrote:
Comparisons between Primeval and Doctor Who have been made in the British press. Heat magazine said "...it's not a fair comparison - where Doctor Who is quirky, playful and very British, this glossy adventure is more in the American style, with spectacular effects, fancy locations and less larking about... For all it's slickness, Primeval would be improved by the presence of a David Tennant or a Billie Piper. But what wouldn't?". Closure magazine commented that as, "Doctor Who proved that decent sci-fi drama can be a huge family hit, so you can't blame ITV for wanting a piece of the action."


You should credit Outpost Gallifrey when you cut and past from their news page TS.
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SharazJek wrote:
Theta Sigma wrote:
Comparisons between Primeval and Doctor Who have been made in the British press. Heat magazine said "...it's not a fair comparison - where Doctor Who is quirky, playful and very British, this glossy adventure is more in the American style, with spectacular effects, fancy locations and less larking about... For all it's slickness, Primeval would be improved by the presence of a David Tennant or a Billie Piper. But what wouldn't?". Closure magazine commented that as, "Doctor Who proved that decent sci-fi drama can be a huge family hit, so you can't blame ITV for wanting a piece of the action."


You should credit Outpost Gallifrey when you cut and past from their news page TS.

First of all I posted that message in my uni library just half an hour before closing time which meant that I posted that in a hurry.

Second of all the source of that report is second hand. It would be like saying that the ABC News should be credited for reporting on John Howard attacking Barack Obama even though he said it on the Sunday program. Therefore I was crediting where those comments originally came from.

Third of all focus on the topic itself, how the information was received is really secondary. As long as the message is received, is all that matters. I am doing this out of courtesy not out of any glory.

Fourth and finally Outpost Gallifrey does not hold jurisdiction over the truth of what goes in Doctor Who, Primeval or anything else.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spoke to a few friends in the UK who have ACTUALLY seen "Primeval" and quiet frankly they aren't very impressed by it. Seems it's more "hype" then an actual show worth watching.

Lame stories and effects are the usual comments.
And it only took 2 years to get to air.

First episode rated around 6.5million from what I was told, which for a premiere in the UK market is somewhat disappointing.

Looks like Channel 9 might not have any programmes this year, as this is their only new one that hasn't been cancelled from what I've read.

I suppose we'll just have to wait and see .......
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SharazJek wrote:
You should credit Outpost Gallifrey when you cut and past from their news page TS.


Actually ..... and I only say this to protect the DWCA forum from possible trouble ..... (and SharaJek, this is not directed at you personally, it's just that you mentioned it) .... you're not legally allowed to cut & paste anything from the OG news page. For any reason, noble or not.

Please to check the Outpost Gallifrey Websites "Terms Of Use".

And that's them saying it, not me, so please, dear forum member, don't tell me what you may think is "OK"; or yell at me about it; address any discussions or complaints to the editior of OG. I'm sure he'll be interested.
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1742
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Theta Sigma wrote:
First of all I posted that message in my uni library just half an hour before closing time which meant that I posted that in a hurry.

Second of all the source of that report is second hand. It would be like saying that the ABC News should be credited for reporting on John Howard attacking Barack Obama even though he said it on the Sunday program. Therefore I was crediting where those comments originally came from.


It's polite to credit your source. Just because you're 'in a hurry' is no excuse to be impolite - in many respects, being polite when you are in a hurry is a lot more real.

You'll also find that, when a TV station uses footage from another TV station, they credit it.

Lastly, all thoose words linking the quotes together? A real person wrote them. A real person who also put all those quotes together and jouned them up. That's the person you are being particularly impolit to.

You normally credit your sources, so please try to do that every time.

(Sorry it sounds like everyone's lecturing you...)
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know there is this attitude that it's "OK" to cut & paste provided you credit the cut & paste, (a lot of people do it and no one seems to care), but as I've tried to point out OUTPOST GALLIFREY states quiet clearly, (as do just about every other website I've ever visited), the YOU CANNOT CUT & PASTE FROM OUTPOST GALLIFREY. Ever. No excuses. That's in their "Terms Of Use". Access our site, read it, but no cutting and pasting from in.

You could probably get away with paraphasing something you've read elsewhere in a post, and mentioning the sourse, but really, no-one should be cutting and pasting without written permission of the copyright owner. That's the website the psot is on.

And really, is there any need to cut and paste?
We all seem to know where most news pages are, and it's much easier to read the news on a news page, rather then sort through a discussion forum to "maybe" find a (naughty) cut & pasted post on some topic.

JMHO. (And the "Terms of Use" of most websites).
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1742
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, it says something like that - 'Any duplication or reproduction of items on this page without permission of the editor is prohibited.'

It should be noted, of course, that much of the Outpost Gallifrey news page includes quotes from magazines. Perhaps they have permission for each and every magazine to use the quotes. Outpost Gallifrey is a US-based web-site, and there's all sorts of bizarre copyright and fair use laws there. By way of example, you can't copyright facts. A reproduction of facts is unlikely to attract any substantial copyright problems, though reproduction of opinions may.

Our commonwealth government was going to amend Australian copyright law to introduce 'fair use' concepts (in fact it was an election promise!) with the specific intention of facilitating posting of material on the internet. However, our copyright law does include the concept of 'fair dealing', and reporting news is one of the categories of fair dealing. It's not as simple as that, of course!

Here's what the Australian Copyright Council has to say on this:

Australian Copyright Council wrote:
Copyright material may be used in reporting news in a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical, or in a film, or by means of a broadcast. The author and title of the work must be acknowledged. Music, however, cannot be included in news reports under this provision, unless the playing of the music is part of the news being reported. (The use of music and sound recordings in this context is usually covered by broadcasters’ “blanket licences” from APRA and PPCA. For further information, see our information sheet Copyright collecting societies.)

The Federal Court has held that “news” is not restricted to current events. For example, old material, or footage that was never related to a current event, may be relevant to current news events. Alternatively, under this
provision investigative journalists may be able to use copyright material they have discovered that relates to past events.

In looking at whether a person’s use of copyright material comes within the exception of fair dealing for reporting news, courts are likely to require more than simply a connection with a newsworthy topic. The crucial element in determining whether the exception applies seems to be whether the primary purpose is to report or comment on news. Although courts have held that reporting news may involve the use of humour, it seems that where a court considers the purpose of using the material is primarily to entertain, the presence of newsworthy issues is not sufficient to make the use a fair dealing.


(That's from Information Sheet G079v04 - Fair Dealing, dated January 2007.)

So where does that leave us? Not 100% certain as I'm not a copyright lawyer, but it is plain that whacking a 'duplication or reproduction prohibited' comment doesn't actually change the relevant copyright laws. (Much like saying, 'Sorry, I didn't mean to punch you' isn't going to protect you from assault charges.)

People should be careful, considerate and polite in posting material from other sources to this forum.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've read the Australian Copyright Act of 1968; and the amendments from the 90s. (And what a headache legalise is. It seems to say one thing while actually sayiong the opposite).

Basically; everything's illegal.

You can't photocopy printed material, you can't operate a device design to record broadcast television or radio etc, etc.

I agree that "People should be careful, considerate and polite in posting material from other sources to this forum".

Perhaps the best idea is to get clearance from the website in question first. And then state that any cut & pasted item is "reproduced under premission of the copyright holder".

Or paraphase it; or just NOT do it.
We all know where the news pages are after all.

Just a thought.

PS. I think you'll find OG has a agreement to reproduce the information it publishes with the various copyright owners.
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1742
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phase5 wrote:
Basically; everything's illegal.


Yep. It's illegal to loan someone a book, sell it second hand, buy it second hand, etc, under the way copyright works. You watched that DVD with a bunch of friends? You've probably broken the copyright law!

Copying and pasting from internet sites is a less common matter than a whole bunch of other copyright infringements that happen every day. Thew world hasn't stopped turning...

Even if there's a fair use/fair dealing argument, the only way to be certain is via the courts.

But, as I say, there's no reason not to be polite about what you are doing.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Greg wrote:
But, as I say, there's no reason not to be polite about what you are doing.


Absolutely.

BTW: Last I heard proposed changes to Australia's copyright laws to include "fair use"; and other modifications to stop as all being technical criminals; didn't go beyond the discussion phase; although I do believe our copyright laws are to be changed as part of the "fair trade" (cough, cough) agreement with the states. Anyone heard anything? But perhaps this is going off topic.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back on topic ...

Just received an email telling me that Series 1 of "Primeval" will be released on DVD on March 19th. Available from the usuaul online suppliers.

Be aware that you may prefer to wait until you've seen it on Channel 9 first. Feedback from friends in the UK is that just like "Torchwood" it didn't live up to the hype and is somewhat disappointing.
Back to top
Greg
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 1742
Location: Canberra

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've also seen mixed reviews of Primeval. The real problem is trying to work out whether your tastes coincide with the tastes of those who like the program or those that dislike it...!
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read in this mornings paper that "Primeval" starts Saturday 28th April on Channel 9. I wonder if they are trying to get the drop on Channel 10 who have "Torchwood"? Both shows being VERY different but with a similiar context. (Time Rift/Portal etc). At least you can let the older kiddies watch "Primeval", it's mostly harmless. (And silly). "Torchwood" is for grownups only, and even then they'll probably tune out.

And I also read that Chaser beat "Heroes" in the ratings. Nice to see some home grown material winning for a change ....
Back to top
arturo



Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 78
Location: Toowoomba

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ive seen a couple of eps of this series and kind of like it.

I think the DW and Torchwood comparisons are inevitable but not altogether fair. It is a different syle of program with a different audience in mind.

The sfx are pretty cool. It is a good looking show with a good looking cast. There are some plot holes and jumps in logic but it seems to be a decent genre type program. Ive seen the 2 and 3rd eps with giant spiders and centipedes and killer croc monsters. There seems to be an interesting story arc to cover the season. My niece loves it (though she is a nerdy 6 yo).

Id give it one thumb up. It's cool. kinda fun, but no DW. In some ways i think it may end up as better than torchwood.
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 3897

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Found out from Madds at Buffy Down Under that Primeval will be at 7:30pm from the aforementioned date of April 28.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> A Holiday For The Doctor All times are GMT + 11 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Web site hosting by Domain Hosting Shop - www.domainhostingshop.com.au