Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index Doctor Who Club of Australia
45
Celebrating the 45th anniversary of Doctor Who
Sunday Nov 23rd at Drummoyne RSL Victoria Rd Drummoyne
11 am to 6 pm
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Torchwood 1.6 'Countrycide' 9:30 23/7/07 TEN
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> Scanner Screen

What did you think of 'Countrycide'?
Excellent
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
Good
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
Average
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
Poor
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Awful
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author Message
dave



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 608
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:12 pm    Post subject: Torchwood 1.6 'Countrycide' 9:30 23/7/07 TEN Reply with quote

WOW. I really, really enjoyed this episode. Right from the beginning it was terrifically spooky, and just got better and better. Of course, it wasn't without flaws, but compared to other eps this one had few, and they were minor.

Nice to see the Cyberwoman and Ianto's involvement in that mess actually got some more screentime. And the developing relationships are good as well. I was surprised at the end, as I thought it a bit of a sudden development, but it worked within the context of what we've seen so far of Gwen's dissatisfaction in her relationship with Reese.

The SUV could only have been a trap if the villagers knew that the group had a tracking device for it. How many people just happen to carry tracking devices for their cars around with them?

I think what impressed me most at the end was that this wasn't put down to some alien threat (maybe), but to people. At least, I think that's the case. Towards the end I was beginning to think too many folks were showing up, but then it turned out the whole village was in on the Harvest. I hope we find out more about this later on.
Back to top
meglos



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 670
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very creepy and I loved it!.The best episode yet. Some of the scenes were very similar to some of the great horror/thriller movies I have seen, which is a good thing Smile. Plenty of twists and turns and shocks (eg: when Gwen gets shot) and the ending was a suprise as well. I've just got this feeling that we hav'nt seen the last of that lot.
9.5/10
Back to top
Tegan



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 405
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a storyline that has been around for ages, (Scottish cannibals, an episode of Supernatural, even Wolf Creek in some ways) and in my opinion was better done than most. Wolf Creek was just gore for its own sake.

The fact is that this episode, at least in the early part led you to beleive it was some form of aliens. The horror and tension was almost all in broad daylight. Or at least as much daylight as you get in Wales. Wink

Very well done. Tight writing, a few red herrings, not too much gore, but what was there was right for the story. I found myself jumping when I wasn't expecting a "frightener", all in all a good solid 4 out of 5.

And Captain Jack showed a very dark side. The old grey Feurgy was unexpected, and the way he dealt with the villagers was totally shocking. A complete surprise to me!

Mark my words, the cybermen are not gone either, and Ianto will play a big role in the last episodes of this show.

I'm really getting excited about Torchwood.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nicely done; but I have to admit to some disappointment at the resolution being a village of cannibals. Only because it's been done before. (Then again with only 7 plots in drama hasn't everything?).

I saw a low budget movie many years back at the Walker St. cinema in Sydney where the cast are chased and terrorised in an isolated township and at the end we find it's a annual cannibal feast and guess who's dinner?

And there was another one involving vampires where the hero escapes a vampire controlled village to find police & police car on the local road. They promptly drive him back to the village, being vampires themselves ...

To be nit picky:
- if the "harvest" takes place every 10 years; with (I assume) 10-20 people disappearring in the same location, you'd think someone would have noticed previously.
- who was looking after Torchwood Cardiff if the whole team was out camping?
- did anyone else feel the team came across as a bit hopeless?
Back to top
SharazJek



Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 902
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This episode demonstrated that humans are far more scarier than aliens.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SharazJek wrote:
This episode demonstrated that humans are far more scarier than aliens.


Probably explains the FERMI Paradox.
Back to top
Tegan



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 405
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phase5 wrote:
SharazJek wrote:
This episode demonstrated that humans are far more scarier than aliens.


Probably explains the FERMI Paradox.


The Fermi paradox forgets one major factor.

We have "The Oncoming Storm" to scare them all away.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tegan wrote:
phase5 wrote:
SharazJek wrote:
This episode demonstrated that humans are far more scarier than aliens.


Probably explains the FERMI Paradox.


The Fermi paradox forgets one major factor.

We have "The Oncoming Storm" to scare them all away.


Except that "The Oncoming Storm" is a fictional character where as human beings are real.
Back to top
Tegan



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 405
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phase5 wrote:

Except that "The Oncoming Storm" is a fictional character where as human beings are real.


Err... Take a look around you, this is a Torchwood forum on a Doctor Who site. The whole concept is fiction.

In the Doctor Who universe we have travel in Time and Space, available to the Daleks and in a limited way Cybermen. Therefore we need an Oncoming Storm.

In the real world, the Fermi "paradox" is no real paradox at all. The so called paradox assumes that any intelligent race would be looking for us or even care. Did Columbus go looking for India and accidentally trip over the Americas on a quest to find an unknown colony of ants on a mountain top of the Andes? I don't think so. The Fermi Paradox assumes a far greater significance to humanity than is plausibly attributable.

According to the theory of Relativity, nothing physical can travel at faster than the speed of light and even a significant percentage of that speed is economically and practically implausible. The energy required is just too much.

Given a civilization can (implausibly) travel at say 10% LS (light speed), that reduces the catchment area to a bubble around earth of 2 billion light years.

And just why would any highly advanced civilization want to come to Earth at all?

Colonization?

One of the assumptions of the Fermi Paradox is that life is abundant in the universe, which implies a huge number of planets capable of supporting life. In which case, why would a civilization want to travel a huge distance on the small chance of finding a suitable planet? There is going to be one available just around the corner. You wouldn't expend energy to go 20,000km to put petrol in your car even if it was far cheaper than the local service station would you?

Scientific exploration?

Earth has been broadcasting radio for only a century or so. If you were looking for evidence of intelligent life, you'd do what SETI is doing and search for radio signals. Limiting the potential civilizations to a hundred or so light years distant, which pretty much sinks the Fermi Paradox on basic principles.

The biggest flaw with the Fermi Paradox is that we have only been looking for ETI for 20 to 30 years, and have searched an incredibly small area of the sky in a remarkably limited bandwidth of radio only.

The universe has been around for at most 20 billion years. For a civilisation to use radio waves to communicate would be at best a thousand or so years before moving on to something better. That 1000 years would have to be at or around the same time as we use radio, limiting the receiving station to being in a band of 1000 or so light years in an expanding bubble.

So we have civilization at a maximum of 100 light years (our transmission history) looking at an insignificant blue-green planet in the unfashionable outer suburbs of the milky way, using an old fashioned communication method. They must then be prepared to expend huge amount of energy in order to drop by to say hello and have a cup of tea.

Far more likely is that any civilization who, against all odds are looking for us, would signal back in the same method. This reduces the search area to 50 light years. There are only 40 stars within 16 light years of Earth, http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/starlog/strclos.html so given an equal distribution, there would be about 1,200 stars within 50 light years.

Even with the most optimistic figures, the chance of an advanced civilization existing on a planet of any one of those stars is minuscule.
Back to top
phase5



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tegan wrote:
phase5 wrote:

Except that "The Oncoming Storm" is a fictional character where as human beings are real.


Err... Take a look around you, this is a Torchwood forum on a Doctor Who site. The whole concept is fiction.

Yes, "err.....", as you put it so well, I do understand that. It's a discussion forum about fictional events. And your point is?

I was just making the observation based on ShaazJek comment that "human beings are scary than aliens" that that is one explanation for the Fermi Paradox.

In a universe that has had plenty of time for life to evolve why don't we see evidence of it somewhere. The answer being that human beings are considered so awful that we are being kept in isolation, which is one of the solutions to the Fermi paradox. Amongst others.

Tegan wrote:
In the Doctor Who universe we have travel in Time and Space, available to the Daleks and in a limited way Cybermen. Therefore we need an Oncoming Storm.

Even in the "Doctor Who Universe" we don't "need" any such thing.
We only need to stand up for ourselves, and stop depending on others.
And frankly the Doctors should be dead a thousand times over.

Tegan wrote:
In the real world, the Fermi "paradox" is no real paradox at all.

Really, then perhaps you should let someone in the science community know you've solved it.

Tegan wrote:
The so called paradox assumes that any intelligent race would be looking for us or even care.

You may wish to revisit the definition of the Fermi Paradox because you appear to have got it completely backwards.

"The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilisations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilisations."

The paradox is that estimations say that we should be able to detect many "alien" civilisations, yet we see and hear nothing.

There's nothing about them looking for us or being interested in looking for us. Unless they have chosen to completely hide themselves we should be able to detect them.
Stephen Baxters book "Deep Future" covers the topic in greater detail than I can here. It's worth finding.

Tegan wrote:
Did Columbus go looking for India and accidentally trip over the Americas on a quest to find an unknown colony of ants on a mountain top of the Andes? I don't think so. The Fermi Paradox assumes a far greater significance to humanity than is plausibly attributable.


Apologies, but it's not a good or workable comparison. (BTW: Columbus was looking for a trade route to India. He got his calculations wrong and found the Bahamas instead. The "Americas" were discovered later. And it really has nothing to do with the Fermi Paradox).

The Fermi Paradox addresses the issue of "there's been enough time for them to exist, they should be there, but we don't see/hear them". That's Fermi's Paradox. And there are a number of solutions. It's nothing to do with them coming to look for us, or the significance, or lack thereof of humanity.

Tegan wrote:
According to the theory of Relativity, nothing physical can travel at faster than the speed of light and even a significant percentage of that speed is economically and practically implausible. The energy required is just too much.


Yes, Special Relativity says that no physical object can exceed the speed of light, but you don't need to exceed the speed of light to cross the galaxy. If you're the member of a sufficiently advanced civilisation death probably no longer exists, (except in extreme circumstances), so spending a few thousand years crossing from one star to the next may not be an issue. There are a number of ways to get from star to star without exceeding LS. Remember Clarke's Laws about sufficiently advanced alien civilisations?

Tegan wrote:
Given a civilization can (implausibly) travel at say 10% LS (light speed), that reduces the catchment area to a bubble around earth of 2 billion light years.


Why is 10% the speed of light "implausible" as you say?

10% of the speed of light may currently be "implausible" for us, but that's not to say it cannot be done. (Carl Sagan covered this rather well in the Cosmos TV Series). It's a bit like living the era of sail and saying you can't get from London to Sydney in 24hrs, then 2 centuries later someone invents the 747 and you can. We can't do it now, they may have been doing it for aeons. And as I mentioned you don't need even 10% of LS to cross the galaxy if you're not in a rush. And it's be shown that a constant acceleration of 1G you can circumnavigate the known universe in 30-40 years. Of course there'd be nothing to come back to.

As for the "2 billion light year" bubble, I'm not quiet sure what you mean.

With the main disk of the Milky Way galaxy 100,000 light-years in diameter and the galaxy containing about 400 billion stars there are plenty of places life might exist much closer than the 2 billion light year bubble, if that's what you mean. No need to go that far out.

Tegan wrote:
And just why would any highly advanced civilization want to come to Earth at all?

Colonization?


I'm tempted to say for the ice-cream.
But yes, colonisation, why not? Who can say for sure?
The problem is we don't know how a highly advanced civilisation MIGHT think, what they MIGHT want to do. Perhaps they just like travelling.

And again, sorry, but the Fermi paradox isn't about travelling across the stars and visiting other worlds. It's about why we haven't detected any signs of life elsewhere. Massive construction projects, radio traffic, and if not radio then some form of communication at least, and if you want to include physical visits then some form of physical evidence. They may have visited here long before we came along, but no coke bottles where left behind for us to find. (see "El Troppo El Blanko" I think).

Tegan wrote:
One of the assumptions of the Fermi Paradox is that life is abundant in the universe, which implies a huge number of planets capable of supporting life.

Sorry, but that's not what it implies.
You can play with the Drake equation and get lots of different answers for the "abundance of life in the universe", (or not), but that's not Fermi.

Tegan wrote:
In which case, why would a civilization want to travel a huge distance on the small chance of finding a suitable planet? There is going to be one available just around the corner.

Who says advanced civilisations are looking for planets?
For whatever purpose.
As I've said, they might just like travelling.
But again, that's not Fermi.

Tegan wrote:
You wouldn't expend energy to go 20,000km to put petrol in your car even if it was far cheaper than the local service station would you?

See above. Not Fermi.

Tegan wrote:
Scientific exploration?

Isn't that what humans have been doing for a long time?

Tegan wrote:
Earth has been broadcasting radio for only a century or so. If you were looking for evidence of intelligent life, you'd do what SETI is doing and search for radio signals. Limiting the potential civilizations to a hundred or so light years distant, which pretty much sinks the Fermi Paradox on basic principles.

There are many ways besides radio to detect the existance of an alien civilisation.
And if the alien civilisation has been around for a billion years and broadcasting for that long we should be able to detect them.

Tegan wrote:
The biggest flaw with the Fermi Paradox is that we have only been looking for ETI for 20 to 30 years, and have searched an incredibly small area of the sky in a remarkably limited bandwidth of radio only.

The whole point of Fermi is that in the time the universe has been around, (approx 13.7 billion years last time I checked, not 20), many civilisations could/should have arisen. If they survived we should be able to detect them, to see some evidence of their existence. It doesn't all come down to broadcasts.

Tegan wrote:
The universe has been around for at most 20 billion years.

See above.

Tegan wrote:
For a civilisation to use radio waves to communicate would be at best a thousand or so years before moving on to something better. That 1000 years would have to be at or around the same time as we use radio, limiting the receiving station to being in a band of 1000 or so light years in an expanding bubble.

So we have civilization at a maximum of 100 light years (our transmission history) looking at an insignificant blue-green planet in the unfashionable outer suburbs of the milky way, using an old fashioned communication method. They must then be prepared to expend huge amount of energy in order to drop by to say hello and have a cup of tea.

Far more likely is that any civilization who, against all odds are looking for us, would signal back in the same method. This reduces the search area to 50 light years. There are only 40 stars within 16 light years of Earth, http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/starlog/strclos.html so given an equal distribution, there would be about 1,200 stars within 50 light years.

Even with the most optimistic figures, the chance of an advanced civilization existing on a planet of any one of those stars is minuscule.


Now you're discussing SETI which is not Fermi. And the Drake equation has many answers. And if we're already sitting inside a transmission "bubble" thats been running for a long time ...?
"The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilizations."

As I said I was just making the observation based on ShaazJek comment that "human beings are scary than aliens" that that is one explanation for the Fermi Paradox.. And a pretty amusing one I think.
Back to top
Tegan



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 405
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phase5 wrote:

Yes, "err.....", as you put it so well, I do understand that. It's a discussion forum about fictional events. And your point is?


Not to put too fine a point on it, that was what I was saying. Where does the so called Fermi Paradox come in to it?

phase5 wrote:

I was just making the observation based on ShaazJek comment that "human beings are scary than aliens" that that is one explanation for the Fermi Paradox.

In a universe that has had plenty of time for life to evolve why don't we see evidence of it somewhere. The answer being that human beings are considered so awful that we are being kept in isolation, which is one of the solutions to the Fermi paradox. Amongst others.


A paradox, by definition doesn't have a solution. Once "solved" it is no longer a paradox.

Fermi questions are an exercise in logic. It requires a realistic estimation of unknown or difficult to count quanta. For instance "How many leaves fall on my street in Autumn?" To make an estimate you'd first count the trees, find out how many are deciduous and use a realistic estimate (assumption) from observation of say, how many leaves per branch and how many branches on each tree. From that you calculate the leaves.

The so called Fermi Paradox uses one, and only one, assumption on the abundance of intelligent life in the universe. The only empirical data we have is that we are the only intelligent life in the universe, so the only realistic estimate we can use is that life is either unique to Earth (unlikely, but possible) or exceedingly rare. On the evidence, this is more likely. Ergo, no paradox.

If you use an unrealistic estimate of the number of branches on a tree of 100,000 you get an unreliable answer to my question. If you count 50 on a tree and use that as a realistic assumption you can get a reliable answer. Just so, the assumption in the Fermi Paradox that the universe is teeming with life is just not logical. There may well be a billion civilizations out there, but there are, as Carl Sagan is oft misquoted "Billions of billions of stars" so any civilization will be very remote from any other. Even worse than Perth at that.

phase5 wrote:

Even in the "Doctor Who Universe" we don't "need" any such thing.
We only need to stand up for ourselves, and stop depending on others.
And frankly the Doctors should be dead a thousand times over.


Oh good grief! It's not real life. You don't write the show. You didn't create the characters. In the Doctor Who universe, it is as it is. If it changes, it's because the writers change it.

phase5 wrote:

Tegan wrote:
In the real world, the Fermi "paradox" is no real paradox at all.

Really, then perhaps you should let someone in the science community know you've solved it.


Science doesn't concern itself with the Fermi Paradox any more than it is in the realm of science to find invisible pink unicorns, fairies at the bottom of the garden, or truthful politicians , for one very good reason. THE ASSUMPTION IS UNREALISTIC!

Scientists may ponder the question, but then some are known to watch Doctor Who and read The Hitchhikers's Guide To The Galaxy as relaxation.

phase5 wrote:

Tegan wrote:
The so called paradox assumes that any intelligent race would be looking for us or even care.

You may wish to revisit the definition of the Fermi Paradox because you appear to have got it completely backwards.

"The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilisations and the lack of evidence for or contact with such civilisations."


Even that assumes "high estimates". There is a whole spectrum of estimates on the number of civilisations in the universe. The Fermi Paradox assumes a number at the high end of the spectrum. Observation indicates a far lower estimate.

phase5 wrote:

Stephen Baxters book "Deep Future" covers the topic in greater detail than I can here. It's worth finding.


It may be, but it is science fiction. I see your "Deep Future" and raise you a HHGTTG. The vast distances between civilized worlds, and the relatively small populations on them gives an average population per cubic light year of such a minute figure that one can assume the population of the Galaxy is zero. Or something like that. But I will hunt down the book if I can find it.

phase5 wrote:
Yes, Special Relativity says that no physical object can exceed the speed of light, but you don't need to exceed the speed of light to cross the galaxy. If you're the member of a sufficiently advanced civilisation death probably no longer exists, (except in extreme circumstances), so spending a few thousand years crossing from one star to the next may not be an issue. There are a number of ways to get from star to star without exceeding LS. Remember Clarke's Laws about sufficiently advanced alien civilisations?


So they'd use magic would they? And I do know Arthur C Clarke's 3 "laws". Number 2 is "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible." It's humour. I love them, but it's not real.

phase5 wrote:

Why is 10% the speed of light "implausible" as you say?


Energy expenditure. The only realistic proposal for a 10% light speed ship would use nuclear explosions. Can you imagine the amount of fissile material to get to even the nearest star in 40 years? Nuclear fusion is, as yet a pipe dream. At 10% LS the shielding needed to protect against dust and even atoms of hydrogen would need to be immense.

A 1% LS generation ship may get somewhere, but why would anyone bother? 10 or more generations to get to a potential new home with the risk of having Spock say "It's life Jim, bit not as we know it." (Sorry, couldn't resist).

Yes it is conceivable that some form of travel indistinguishable from magic may be invented by another civilization. But then, why would they care to use it to talk to the ants on the Andes? (The point I was making about Columbus)

phase5 wrote:

And it's be shown that a constant acceleration of 1G you can circumnavigate the known universe in 30-40 years. Of course there'd be nothing to come back to.


And you'd have to use all and more of the energy in the universe to do it. If I could drive my car straight up, I'd reach space in about 20 minutes. Sod gravity and no road and no oxygen. Space is so really close!

phase5 wrote:

As for the "2 billion light year" bubble, I'm not quiet sure what you mean.


The universe is about 20 billion years old, give or take a candle or ten. 10%LS travel limits the catchment area for alien civilizations to be physically contactable to 2 billion light years.

phase5 wrote:
With the main disk of the Milky Way galaxy 100,000 light-years in diameter and the galaxy containing about 400 billion stars there are plenty of places life might exist much closer than the 2 billion light year bubble, if that's what you mean. No need to go that far out.


Simply setting a initial limit on the number of available stars to a very small proportion of everything.

phase5 wrote:
Tegan wrote:
And just why would any highly advanced civilization want to come to Earth at all?

Colonization?


I'm tempted to say for the ice-cream.


I'll concede the point. Smile

phase5 wrote:

But yes, colonisation, why not? Who can say for sure?


As I pointed out, if intelligent life is abundant, why cross the galaxy to colonise? If the technology is that advanced, why not terraform (or beetelform if that's where they're from) a planet suitable and much closer to home?

phase5 wrote:

And again, sorry, but the Fermi paradox isn't about travelling across the stars and visiting other worlds. It's about why we haven't detected any signs of life elsewhere. Massive construction projects, radio traffic, and if not radio then some form of communication at least, ...


Massive only on some terms. Insignificant on a universal, or even galactic scale, Minuscule in time as a proportion of recorded civilization on earth.

Saying we haven't seen any evidence of extraterrestrial life since we began looking, is like saying. "I went to the theatre today and didn't see anyone die on stage, I wonder why no one dies on stage?" (As in dead, not as in failed to entertain)

phase5 wrote:

Tegan wrote:
One of the assumptions of the Fermi Paradox is that life is abundant in the universe, which implies a huge number of planets capable of supporting life.

Sorry, but that's not what it implies.
You can play with the Drake equation and get lots of different answers for the "abundance of life in the universe", (or not), but that's not Fermi.


Sorry, but you are just plain wrong. Look to your own definition of the Fermi Paradox earlier in your last post. "high estimates of probability of extraterrestrial civilisations"

As for the rest of your response, it's obfuscation, not debate. And this thread is going on way too long to interest anyone but ourselves. I think I've made my point saliently. So I'll bow out.
Back to top
Theta Sigma



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 4466

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my what a terrifying episode this turned out to be and what a shock that the monsters turned out to be human cannibals.
I also got shocked when Gwen got shot and wow what an entrance Jack made with that tractor and shooting the cannibals.
The guy who played Evan, Owen Teale looked very familiar that I had to look him up at IMDb - he was Maldak in Vengeance on Varos.
Gwen sleeping with Owen. Hardly a surprise as it looked inevitable from their kiss in Cyberwoman.
Back to top
Panecea



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 121
Location: A point in time and space...

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recently finished Torchwood series 1 and this episode was the most "terrifying" or at least the most disconcerting. Most "chilling" event was at the end when the head of the village gave his reason for carrying out the "harvest". Best episode, or episodes rather, are later in the series.
Back to top
Ickabod



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 552
Location: far far away

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow!!!! Talk about "passive-aggressive"......so this is an episode to look forward too I gather
Back to top
Panecea



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 121
Location: A point in time and space...

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tegan wrote:
This is a storyline that has been around for ages, (Scottish cannibals, an episode of Supernatural...


I immediately thoough of the story of the family of highland cannibals and I agree that this type of story hasn't been executed as well on other shows.

In answer to Ickabod's question, yes and no, it's certainly not the worst but it's not the best either.
Back to top
Ickabod



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 552
Location: far far away

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Panecea wrote:
Tegan wrote:
This is a storyline that has been around for ages, (Scottish cannibals, an episode of Supernatural...


I immediately thoough of the story of the family of highland cannibals and I agree that this type of story hasn't been executed as well on other shows.

In answer to Ickabod's question, yes and no, it's certainly not the worst but it's not the best either.


Thank you Panecea
Back to top
Odnet



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 61
Location: Mudgee

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I loved this. Mostly. There were a lot of twists and turns. A few real shocks and a great sense of tension even though it was mostly in daylight.
Two things let it down for me.

1. Gwen and Owen. He is such a sleaze, what does she see in him. Gwen is such a great character. She should have the sexual tension bit with someone worthy.

2. Jacks big rescue. It was just too easy and expected. It could of topped off a fantastic episode had they come up with something as surprising as the rest of it.

One more thing. Is it just me or does Jack move kinda funny when in gun touting mode?
Back to top
Sulp Niar



Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be honest, it wasn’t terrible. I missed the first fifteen minutes or so, so I can’t comment on that, but from what I saw, there was nothing actually wrong with ‘Countrycide’. It was competently directed, it had wonderfully gruesome corpses, it had competent character interaction and it had a competent plot. The problem is of course the “competent”; so many of these things were passable, but rarely was anything brilliant, meaning that, rather ironically for an episode about cannibals with meat hooks and stripping skin from bodies, it’s all rather forgettable.

There were some excellent things, though. For a start, Owen Teale was grittily excellent as the main villain; it was a fairly typical representation of someone dirty, but it’s usually the thing you see for stereotypical perverts as opposed to cannibals, so it worked very well. When Teale waltzed on screen, I suddenly realised that ‘Countrycide’ reminded me of Ravenous; Teale just had that black comedy/gruesome villainy to him that Robert Carlyle showed in Ravenous. The problem was that, due to the time restrictions, Teale wasn’t actually on screen much; furthermore, despite his performance, the character wasn’t truly anything special – when Gwen asks him why he does it, he simply says it makes him happy, which is dirty, believable yet slightly disappointing. I wasn’t expecting a master plan or anything, but a little more dialogue on just why he enjoys human flesh would have been better, and more adult than the fridges of skin, for a start. I already said that the makeup and effects were great; true, there were no alien zaps or anything here, so basic believability was assured from the start, but the corpses were very well done, stylised and realistic at the same time. I quite liked the location too, with the dead pheasants (and the obviously added sound effects of crows and flies), and the stone walls. The acting, particularly of the scared extras, was rather good (and Teale’s wife or whatever she was deserves a mention too, seeming quite sympathetic at first – a twist of personality that works better than the policeman’s similar twist does later). Finally, the regulars do get good interaction here; the standouts are Gwen and Owen, who spend most of the episode staring into each other’s eyes before, at the end of the episode, we see her snogging him in what is presumably his flat. I think that this is the first romance that has convinced me so far in Torchwood; Gwen’s speech really shows that the Torchwood gang are really just social delinquents, and now that she’s joined the club, she’s forced to share her thoughts and body with the least social of them all (Owen had to basically rape in his first story, remember). The other bits of interaction were largely reactionary to the situations they were in, but it was a bit refreshing to see all of the main characters given a fair amount of acting and action to do this time (Ianto and Tosh in particular). Captain Jack also got a scene where he tortures a man for information, which, even though it was probably deserved, was a tad over the edge (he can’t die, so he doesn’t recognise that others feel pain, or rather he thinks if he can’t feel it others should? Just what does his lack of morality do to his morals?).

In a way, I also liked the idea that all of the villagers were cannibals, because it meant that we only ever saw one victim (other than the Torchwood gang) throughout the story, and everyone else was listening to their animalistic side within. On the other hand, the idea of a ritualistic cannibalism every ten years is a bizarre tradition, and almost seems like a nastier version of what the Pertwee era did to the rural areas (where everyone was stupid and the Doctor proved that he was much better than them). Other than being amusingly crap, Owen’s line which went something like “Just a normal day in the country... you sick fuckers” really illustrated this. I must admit that I liked the country setting, because it gave a more refreshing location than the city, but god, it doesn’t portray villagers in a good light – I notice that none of them protested at what they were doing at any point (even though realistically they would have already been killed for doing so, in TV drama it pays to have some level of sympathy for some in a group mentality).

Once you’ve thought about everything I’ve already mentioned though, it’s hard not to just remember the clichéd camera angles (complete with faster than lightning villagers – how the hell did they move so fast if they aren’t alien?) and fairly average ambition to the story overall. There’s nothing wrong with Torchwood doing a black comedy, but there’s nothing special about it either, so ‘Countrycide’ was passable entertainment and nothing more.

One last point; why did Jack tell Gwen to go into that shack first (leading to her being shot)? Jack, my man, YOU CAN’T DIE. So why do you keep asking your team members to move out in front of you? What sort of leadership is this from an immortal being? At least he tells her not to fight when she’s already wounded, but by then the damage has been done. He doesn’t really think these things through, our Jack.
Back to top
Ickabod



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 552
Location: far far away

PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OMG!!! lots to wade through there....hmmmm Jack and Gwen with her getting shot.....if the cannibles tore off a part of Jack's body would it grow back?
Back to top
Tegan



Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 405
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ickabod wrote:
OMG!!! lots to wade through there....hmmmm Jack and Gwen with her getting shot.....if the cannibles tore off a part of Jack's body would it grow back?


I'd guess so, but that might be behind a certain revelation made at the end of series 3 of Doctor Who. Don't want to say more for spoiler reasons.

If this is too obvious Greg, please delete it. I nearly blurted out that [CENSORED]
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Doctor Who Club of Australia Forum Index -> Scanner Screen All times are GMT + 11 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Web site hosting by Domain Hosting Shop - www.domainhostingshop.com.au