|
|
| What did you think of Daleks in Manhattan? |
| It transformed me |
|
33% |
[ 8 ] |
| Good |
|
37% |
[ 9 ] |
| Average |
|
29% |
[ 7 ] |
| Poor |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| A real Pig |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 24 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 552 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Heh heh heh......mind you in all my ignorance, I actually didn't know when they were built....but if the scenes were of New York, and the Towers weren't blown up it would have been hard to explain away as they were prominant features... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 4428
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Found out the ratings for the episode from Phantom at knowfirst and unfortunately Daleks In Manhattan got beaten by the debut of The Dame Edna Treatment on 9. In Sydney it beat Daleks In Manhattan 983000 to 839000. The Dame Edna Treatment came in at 6th place for the July 21 viewing to 10th place for Daleks In Manhattan.
Curse those promotions for The Dame Edna Treatment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 841 Location: My own little world
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Theta Sigma wrote: | | Curse those promotions for The Dame Edna Treatment. |
What promotions? Actually, I hardly watch any Channel 9, so if they did exist I wouldn't have noticed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 4428
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I actually only seen one ad for it but I must been thinking about the good reviews for The Dame Edna Treatment which I noticed beforehand including Robin Oliver from SMH Guide who gave it the SHOW OF THE WEEK and Oliver is someone who usually has positive things to say about Doctor Who.
Perhaps it would been accurate for me to have said "Curse those good reviews of The Dame Edna Treatment." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ADAMK
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 219 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Theta Sigma wrote: | Found out the ratings for the episode from Phantom at knowfirst and unfortunately Daleks In Manhattan got beaten by the debut of The Dame Edna Treatment on 9. In Sydney it beat Daleks In Manhattan 983000 to 839000. The Dame Edna Treatment came in at 6th place for the July 21 viewing to 10th place for Daleks In Manhattan.
Curse those promotions for The Dame Edna Treatment. |
Hi TS,
If you're interested I have started a thread where I will update the ratings for DW & TW over the weeks. See http://www.drwhoaustralia.org/board/viewtopic.php?t=1652
cheers,
Adam.
PS. I enjoyed this episode more the second time around! I think it has some good moments and is not half as bad as some of the fan reaction suggests! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 841 Location: My own little world
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing I didn't understand was why there were 4 Daleks. In Doomsday it only showed Sec using the "Emergency Temporal Shift", so I guess the others must have used it too. They should have made it more clear.
Also, the Time War made it so the Time Lords never existed, so was it the same with the Daleks? Coz if it wasn't, that could mean that the Doctor could encounter some pre-Time War Daleks at some point, and he could never fully defeat them... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Odnet
Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 61 Location: Mudgee
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good but not great. The Daleks just don't seem as scary as they used to be. I hope things come together nicely in the second part. I also found it a bit odd that Tallulah didn't recognize Laslos voice in the Sewer.
I'm beginning to think that The Doctor might be starting to regret inviting Martha along. Why? Because she is always getting kidnapped. Or at least she has been lately. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tegan
Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 405 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Odnet wrote: | Good but not great. The Daleks just don't seem as scary as they used to be. I hope things come together nicely in the second part.
|
I think maybe the Daleks aren't as scary because we're all 30 years older. (40 in my case, sob). But on the other hand, they did seem a bit less threatening in this episode even than in the last two series. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 552 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tegan wrote: |
I think maybe the Daleks aren't as scary because we're all 30 years older. (40 in my case, sob). But on the other hand, they did seem a bit less threatening in this episode even than in the last two series. |
I can sooooo relate to that  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 841 Location: My own little world
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Everyone keeps saying that there was no mention of Rose, but remember the Doctor did say that when he loses everything they always survive, so that's something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 552 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well we know she's not "dead" but she's not part of the Whoinverse anymore.....I mean in other regenerations the Doc never pined for his conpanions...male or female and he, like most fans carries on....just ask Billie .and besides MP....you hive have your dreams with Rose in them  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 841 Location: My own little world
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm not saying they should mention Rose, I'm just saying they do, even if her name isn't actually said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 552 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| montypython wrote: | | I'm not saying they should mention Rose, I'm just saying they do, even if her name isn't actually said. |
yeah....she was mentioned last night when Tallulah and Martha where discussing the Doc "conpanion" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tegan
Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 405 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ickabod wrote: | | montypython wrote: | | I'm not saying they should mention Rose, I'm just saying they do, even if her name isn't actually said. |
yeah....she was mentioned last night when Tallulah and Martha where discussing the Doc "conpanion" |
"Conpanion"? Trust me, the relationship is Purely platonic.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kangamac
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 2757
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Overall, a good episode.
Thankfully it kept away from much of the immature sexual innuendo of recent years. There was the relationship between the show girl and the mutant, but at least that was not overdone and it did not get in the way of the main plot.
Mind you, I do wonder why they can recreate New York from the 1930's so effectively - and yet RTD dimisses the idea of doing too many alien planet stories because of their lack of creativity in such matters. Sounds like nonsense to me.
Shame about the truly unimaginative title... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sulp Niar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 775 Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I enjoy the title, mainly because it really throws up the B-Movie aspect of the entire production - you know, sweeping shots of New York, Frankenstein and all that. B-Movies may not have artistic integrity, but they have their charm, so I loved the title. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|