|
|
| Author |
Message |
Seamus
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 102 Location: Dee Why
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:57 pm Post subject: Paganism 101 and an Alternative to a Christian Christmas. |
|
|
Hello,
Anyone here into Paganism?
I wouldn't mind celebrating Yule in a pre-Christian fashion... if I knew how.
I know little about Paganism - just something about a sun good and a moon goddess or god or something. I think "The Goddess" is a Wiccan deity.
I have this notion Paganism is somewhat in tune with nature - with "Mother Earth" - (wearing my Rose-coloured Glasses regarding Paganism) while Christianity is a cultural amalgum contrived for political gain.
I also want to know if Southern Hemisphere Pagan rituals are in opposition to that of the Northern Hemisphere and should Aussie Pagans celebrate Yule in July and not December/January?
Any tips appreciated. I'll Google on this topic and wish I'd looked into it earlier because maybe I could have draped my workplace with statuettes of "The Goddess" and Ivy or real missletow (sp?) - or whatever.
I just want to thumb my nose a little at Christian tradition and reminisce and imagine how my Irish and French ancestors may have celebrated in a pre-Christian era.
EDIT - Here is a little on the Winter Solstice and Yule.
"The Winter Solstice is the day where there is the shortest time between the sun rising and the sun setting. It happens between December 22nd and December 25th. To pagans this meant that the winter was over and spring was coming and they had a festival to celebrate it and worshipped the sun for winning over the darkness of winter. (The Winter Solstice in Scandinavia and some other parts of northern Europe is called Yule.)"
So "Christmas in July" is not far off the mark? This is our "Yule" time? Our Winter Solstice... or is it June?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g,uest
Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The so called Christians are Disgracful, for what they did in the past
'They stole the Pagan's Ritual's & ceremonies and made it there own
For the events that people celebrate in the months of December & March,
Are quite an insult.. If you know the Pagan-origins, and then how they where Stolen by Hypocrites  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sulp Niar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 731 Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aye, and the Romans nicked theirs from the Greeks. That sort of stuff just happens. There's no such thing as a religion separate to all the others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 892 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sulp Niar wrote: | | There's no such thing as a religion separate to all the others. |
Hold me back! Hold me back!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dave
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 605 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd like to see you prove otherwise, SJ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 892 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dave wrote: | | I'd like to see you prove otherwise, SJ. |
You're a meany Blewskers. Time for 'Fear of a Blank Planet' track 3................ahhhhhhh.....that's better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dave
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 605 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you need a bit of 'Anaesthetize' eh?
It's a good one, for sure  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sulp Niar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 731 Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SharazJek wrote: | | Sulp Niar wrote: | | There's no such thing as a religion separate to all the others. |
Hold me back! Hold me back!! |
Hahaha, sorry.
You know - talking nostalgia-like here - I completely forgot there was that massive discussion on religion in the wake of 'Ghost Light' here on DWCA.
But I'm quite happy to be proved wrong - I don't know every single religion in the world, so it was a pretty sweeping statement I made admittedly. Maybe Jedi Knight doesn't nick from another religion then (though, I remember someone telling me ages ago that it's Buddhism-lite. I can't remember what they said, and they may be wrong, too, so... never mind). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 692 Location: Usually a school computer
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sulp Niar wrote: | | There's no such thing as a religion separate to all the others. |
I do Religion at school, and how's this for confusion - the angel that gave Muhammad messages from Allah to start Islam is apparently the same angel that told Mary she was having Jesus! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 504 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apparently when JC disappeared before he started preaching, he went to many different countries to study different religions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1766 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nah, a number of religions arise from similar roots. Both Jews and Muslims recognise Jesus as a great prophet - just not the son of God or someone worth following as your personal lord and saviour. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ickabod
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 504 Location: far far away
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Greg wrote: | | Nah, a number of religions arise from similar roots. Both Jews and Muslims recognise Jesus as a great prophet - just not the son of God or someone worth following as your personal lord and saviour. |
heh heh heh nicely put....maybe he visited them for their views and news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Panecea
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 121 Location: A point in time and space...
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| All human paradigms suffer from the same ailments to some degree. The idea is generated with good intentions. They're then warped and changed through the millennia to suit the popular culture of the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dave
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 605 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Panecea wrote: | | All human paradigms suffer from the same ailments to some degree. The idea is generated with good intentions. They're then warped and changed through the millennia to suit the popular culture of the time. |
I'm not sure this is totally accurate. If christianity had changed to suit our current popular culture, it wouldn't, for example, get so upset about homosexual relationships.
Of course, people used to use biblical passages to support slavery, but that went out of vogue a while ago. And maybe the attitude within some christian churches is changing towards homosexuals.
But then there's Islam. To the best of my knowledge (which is slight, and if I'm wrong I'll be happy to be corrected) this hasn't altered itself much at all to fit into 'popular culture'.
And seeing as 'paradigm' could include atheism, agnosticism or even vegetarianism, you might be better served with the word 'religion' there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Panecea
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 121 Location: A point in time and space...
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My comment is made in a general sense and it is accurate within that context. You'll find that through out the ages small bits of history have been distorted to illustrate and reinforce particular ideologies.
Humans are notoriously brilliant at justifying their position, whether or not it is considered right in an idealistic sense.
This appplies to nearly every human paradigm, including religion. You'll find that the culture of today is one of indifference, no one group is completely accepting of the other and so they merely tolerate the others existence. In time this will change, yes, but we are not there yet and popular culture reflects this.
I believe you are confusing popular culture with idealism. Popular culture is only partly reflected in media. Popular culture is referred to as such because it is considered to be the general attitude of the populus.
Last edited by Panecea on Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1766 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Islam is a newer religion, but it has generated variations. The Shi'ites, for example, are more fundamentalist than the Sunnis.
Similarly, it is inaccurate to say that all Christians are opposed to homosexual relationships, even if some point to various passages in the Bible that same sex* sexual activity with disfavour, although many of them are nestled close to other passages that are opposed to the eating of shellfish and others that say it is OK to eat any insect as long as it hops! The Bible supports many activities we generally abhor today (as do the Talmud and the Koran).
And possibly Panecea's use of 'paradigm' is correct - after all, you mention vegetarianism, and that has been used by some to generate extra cash for companies and individuals rather than seeking to killing animals simply for a meal.
* Pedants please note: the Bible is silent on the issue of homosexuality as it is a term coined during the 18th century, and has been in use in English a bit over 100 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Panecea
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 121 Location: A point in time and space...
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you for illustrating my point, Greg. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 892 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Panecea wrote: | | All human paradigms suffer from the same ailments to some degree. The idea is generated with good intentions. They're then warped and changed through the millennia to suit the popular culture of the time. |
Human ideas can be warped, for sure. But if you take the Bible for instance, with some of it's original existing texts dated at over 2,000 years, some translations of it today, (those without theological bias) haven't changed much at all. So that comes down to the question of whether you believe a sacred text to be divinely inspired or simply the work of men. I think most here would believe it to be the work of men and nothing more.
You can use many texts in the Bible to support wrong ideas. The Crusaders did it, and today Christians do the same thing. Just today I was reading about the origin of the word 'Lucifer'. It is generally taught to be another name for Satan, but in actual fact it's nothing of the sort. But the clergy adoped the idea into pop culture and it stuck. Similarly the number 666 is generally thought to be 'the Devil's number' even by people who know nothing about the Bible. That also has been adopted by pop culture. The number 666 has nothing to do with the Devil, nor does the beast the number is attatched to. But even in Doctor Who, a show massively influenced by pop culture, these common misconceptions are used and treated as fact.
Homosexuality is indeed condemned in the Bible, along with any other type of 'porneia' or fornication. It doesn't discriminate between those who 'commit adultery' and 'men who lie with men', other than to describe the sex acts. Either one is as bad as the other according to the Bible.
In Seamus' initial post he spoke about the winter solstace. He's spot on in the element of paganism that has been adopted by Christendom. None if it is Biblical. In fact it's totally contradictory to the instructions given throughout the Bible to 'touch nothing unclean' in regards to false worship.
Panecea is also spot on IMO in that the feeling of 'indifference' to others beliefs in particular will change. The Bible prophesies that world governments will one day turn on religion (described in Revelation as 'Babylon The Great'). I happen to believe that, seeing as most of the prophecies in the Bible have already come true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montypython
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 692 Location: Usually a school computer
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SharazJek wrote: |
Similarly the number 666 is generally thought to be 'the Devil's number' even by people who know nothing about the Bible. That also has been adopted by pop culture. The number 666 has nothing to do with the Devil, nor does the beast the number is attatched to. |
Ah, but 666 is the number of a beast - one of the beasts that rises up into the world as it comes to an end. Or maybe it was the beast it helped. Whatever, here's the quote:
"The beast forced all the people ... to have a mark placed on their right hands or on their foreheads. No one could buy or sell without this mark, that is, the beast's name or the number that stands for the name ... Whoever is intelligent can figure out the meaning of the number of the beast, because the number stands for the name of someone. Its number is 666."
Hmm, that stuff about figuring out the name reminds me of the Carrionites...
By the way, did anyone else realise this in Doomsday when the Doctor asked Rose to open "Hell"?
"Those coordinates over there - set them all to 6." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1766 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
666 is also the broadcast frequency of ABC radio in Canberra - and the number of one of the traffic light signal boxes on King St, Newtown - not very far from the the DWCA Tavern occurs on the first Friday of each month.
I draw no conclusions from either of these facts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|