|
|
| The Five Doctors |
| Excellent |
|
14% |
[ 3 ] |
| Very Good |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| Good |
|
52% |
[ 11 ] |
| Fair |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
| Turkey |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ADAMK
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 215 Location: Canberra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dazza
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've given it an excellent, not due to the story but becuase of the nostalgia. I remember when the Five Doctors was first screened- the hype was amazing.
I've watched Five Doctors more times than any other Who story.
Shame Tom Baker wasn't in it proper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rundoctoritsthegatherer Serial Pest
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 278 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Overrated rubbish, but gave it fair ONLY for the nostalgia element. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the Shada footage was used for Tom's appearance and as we know Shada was written by Douglas Adams and this comes just as we are nearing the Doctor's 42nd (get it) birthday on November 23 which is why I just bought the Eighth Doctor/Fitz/Triz novel The Tomorrow Windows which is author Jonathan Morris' tribute to the work of Adams whom he dedicates the book too.
The Five Doctors is then followed by Warriors of the Deep and I also bought the novelisation of it as I was told it is way better than what was shown on screen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom N.
Joined: 07 Jul 2005 Posts: 144 Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It gets a 'Good' rating from me. It's fun to see all the Doctors and companions together, but that's about it. The various Cybermassacres are cool, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 889 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great gathering of past stars and monsters of the show.
Utterly crappy story.
Why oh why did Bob Holmes pull out of this one!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SharazJek wrote: | Great gathering of past stars and monsters of the show.
Utterly crappy story.
Why oh why did Bob Holmes pull out of this one!!  |
I agreed that it was crap a case of promising so much but producing so little.
However from what I heard about Bob Holmes' original Six Doctors plotline it wasn't that much better which is why he pulled out. The crappiness of the Six Doctors plotline is reflected in The Two Doctors which used elements of that abandoned story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wester
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 604 Location: Brisbane
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, I too was greatly disappointed that there was no Tom Baker. But I understand his reasons for not doing it. I still remember the photo that had the wax dummy. lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meglos
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Perth
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have the Five Doctors on DVD and I have noticed a few differences between this one and the video I recorded from UKTV a few years ago. Right at the end of the one from UKTV the fourth Doctor and Romana are getting back into the Tardis from somewhere. And also when the other 3 doctors go back into their Tardis's and leave one by one, you see 3 tardis's take off rather than just 3 blurry blobs like on the DVD. This probably makes no sense to anyone, So if anyone else has noticed this and can explain it better, please feel free to do so  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom N.
Joined: 07 Jul 2005 Posts: 144 Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the version on DVD is the Special Edition, which has some shots shuffled around and updated effects. That's probably why the televised version is a bit different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Fifth Doctor feels heartaches each time his previous selves got taken but theorectically the Second, Third and Fourth Doctor should have gotten the same pain. I mean why didn't the Second Doctor felt anything when the First Doctor got taken and so on. Therefore the Second, Third and Fourth Doctors should theorectically had an advance warning that something was happening just like the Fifth Doctor.
One theory on why the First Doctor looked like Richard Hurndall that I noticed at the Gallifrey forum was that he was Kamelion in disguise. Richard Hurnadall got the part after JNT saw him in the Blake's 7 episode Assassin.
Edmund Warwick was a double for Bill Hartnell back in the 1960s and unlike other doubles actually got credited as the Doctor Who albeit as "Robot Doctor Who" when he played the robot version of the Doctor in The Chase. Craig Hinton said at the Gallifrey forum back in 2003 that Warwick in an interview actually moaned about not being included as the First Doctor in The Five Doctors.
Another possible First Doctor candidate for this story was Creature from the Pit guest star Geoffrey Bayldon which I found out about in a letter to DWM. When Bayldon actually got to play the Doctor for the first Unbound audio he told DWM he was actually the first to be asked to play the Doctor on the TV series before turning it down.
Even though he didn't appear in person it was still nice to see Tom again from that Shada footage. It's funny that this anniversary story most especially the footage from Shada written by Douglas Adams is shown in the month of Doctor Who's 42nd anniversary.
Philip Latham looks much more creepier as Borusa then Leonard Sachs in Arc of Infinity.
Took me sometime to realise the Dalek scene was omitted. Does not look well for Resurrection.
Even though it was not originally intended that way but Sarah falling down at the end of Part 1. Brilliant cliffhanger (yeah right). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
In Part 2 the First Doctor says that there are five of him now and Tegan was in the TARDIS when he said that. In Uncle Terrance's own novel The Eight Doctors, Tegan mistakenly thought the Eighth Doctor to have been the one trapped in the time vortex. This would mean that Uncle Terrance was either unaware or forgotten that Tegan had met the Fourth Doctor first in Logopolis. Therefore she would have figured out by later meeting the Second and Third Doctors and by doing the math that it was the Fourth Doctor who was trapped in the vortex.
Wonder how Bill fans reacted to Richard saying that he was "the original you might say"?
As with the previous episode, Tom along with Lalla is seen again albeit from an image from Shada rather than from a footage.
Jon never met the Cybermen during his official tenure but upon seeing them here he doesn't mention them by name.
Upon first seeing this on the Doctor's birthday on November 23 in 1997 found it a bit odd that Susan when talking to Tegan, referred to the Fifth Doctor as "the Doctor" instead of "Grandfather". So only the First Doctor is her grandfather is that how it works??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hiruma
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 173 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
My favorite scene from the entire story of the Five Doctors was the Raston Warrior Robot scene. Just when you think the Cybermen are gonna catch up to the Doctor the dancing begins. Whover they got to play the Robot did so well.
Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom N.
Joined: 07 Jul 2005 Posts: 144 Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Theta Sigma wrote: | | Upon first seeing this on the Doctor's birthday on November 23 in 1997 found it a bit odd that Susan when talking to Tegan, referred to the Fifth Doctor as "the Doctor" instead of "Grandfather". So only the First Doctor is her grandfather is that how it works??? |
I noticed that too. I guess it would have been awkward for Susan to refer to Davison as 'Grandfather', especially since she is clearly older than him.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 889 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom N. wrote: | | Theta Sigma wrote: | | Upon first seeing this on the Doctor's birthday on November 23 in 1997 found it a bit odd that Susan when talking to Tegan, referred to the Fifth Doctor as "the Doctor" instead of "Grandfather". So only the First Doctor is her grandfather is that how it works??? |
I noticed that too. I guess it would have been awkward for Susan to refer to Davison as 'Grandfather', especially since she is clearly older than him.  |
However it would have been nice to see that the affection between them was still there, even in different regenerations.
This is not something that would have been overlooked by RTD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1743 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom N. wrote: | | Theta Sigma wrote: | | Upon first seeing this on the Doctor's birthday on November 23 in 1997 found it a bit odd that Susan when talking to Tegan, referred to the Fifth Doctor as "the Doctor" instead of "Grandfather". So only the First Doctor is her grandfather is that how it works??? |
I noticed that too. I guess it would have been awkward for Susan to refer to Davison as 'Grandfather', especially since she is clearly older than him.  |
The thing is, of course, that having an older woman calling a younger man 'Grandfather' would have gone a few steps to emphasising something that differentiates the Time Lords (with their regeneration) from humans - that the nature of their society must logically require a differet perception of others, wemphasisng other personal aspects than physical appearance.
It was a missed chance that would have required a writer with a bit more subtlety than Terrance Dicks to deal with. (No offence to Terrance, who has given us some good stories, but emotional subtlety isn't one of his strong points!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beatly
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 375 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hiruma wrote: | My favorite scene from the entire story of the Five Doctors was the Raston Warrior Robot scene. Just when you think the Cybermen are gonna catch up to the Doctor the dancing begins. Whover they got to play the Robot did so well.
Matt |
I absolutely loved the Raston Warrior Robot! It could have been so wonderful in a story of its own, perhaps with the Raston people as well. Ah, well, the world of Who is full of missed opportunities... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeYates
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 98
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject: In or out |
|
|
Do we know for a fact that the Dalek was in the original aired version? Which would be the base for this one.
Could it be that the Dalek in just in the VHS/DVD version, which i understand has an extra 10 minutes of footage included.
That would explain everything sufficiently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1743 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's been a long time since I saw the original version of this, but I'm sure the Dalek was included - JNT was keen to have all kinds of familiar elements in teh 20th anniverary special, and I'm sure a Dalek (at least in cameo) was high on the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kerr Avon
Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 478
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I taped the original when it first aired and watched it over and over again over the following year or two, a the Dalek scene was definitely there.
I'm passing on The Five Doctors as aired by the ABC - I have the R1 DVD which I watched today with my kids instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|