|
|
| The Five Doctors |
| Excellent |
|
14% |
[ 3 ] |
| Very Good |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| Good |
|
52% |
[ 11 ] |
| Fair |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
| Turkey |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Beatly
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 375 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know that when UK Gold repeated this back in the 90s at some point, it had the Dalek in it. My VHS copy has the Dalek in it, but it also has a yellow banner in the corner saying "The Unabridged Version". I was only three and a half years old when it was first broadcast, so you can't expect me to remember that.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dazza
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Greg wrote: | | It's been a long time since I saw the original version of this, but I'm sure the Dalek was included - JNT was keen to have all kinds of familiar elements in teh 20th anniverary special, and I'm sure a Dalek (at least in cameo) was high on the list. |
The Dalek was definitely in the original. It was special at the time because it was the first time you saw the inside of a Dalek.
Honestly, this whole Dalek thing seems to make no sense at all. We were able to see all the Dalek stories written by Terry Nation, but for some reason we can't see the one's that aren't. Are they not up to scratch? Is the estate paid for Terry Nation penned stories but not for those that aren't? Why is Terry Nation's Estate holding out? Having a new generation introduced to the Daleks can only help their popularity.
Doctor Who will survive without the Daleks, but the Daleks won't survive without Doctor Who. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Lucantonio
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's off air footage from the Evil of the Daleks on Lost in Time that shows the inside of a dalek, not sure if it was in the transmitted version being born 20 years later |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeYates
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 98
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:07 pm Post subject: Omitted |
|
|
So the Dalek was edited out of this one. But they couldn't have done that for The War Games .
You notice on the 1st episode there were 6 people credited as The Doctor, then only 4 people on the 2 episode.
For part 1 couldn't they have had the cliffhanger when the Cyberman grabed onto the Brigadier, that was only about 30 seconds proir to the lame cliffhanger of Sarah-Jane falling down the hill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kerr Avon
Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 478
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hillhanger < cliffhanger |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master_BeyondTheGrave
Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:27 am Post subject: Re: Omitted |
|
|
| MikeYates wrote: | So the Dalek was edited out of this one. But they couldn't have done that for The War Games .
You notice on the 1st episode there were 6 people credited as The Doctor. |
Didn't anyone see on the first episode,
at the 'intro part, where the ABC do that "back to the future" thing,
They showed a clip of the 1st doctor, which had a brown or yellow-tint on it, over the original black & white-version.
It was taken from,
The dalek invasion on earth, The end part where the doctor locks susan out of the tardis and gives here that speech about coming back for here!
Then it cuts into the Intro & a slightly different intro sequence but you can hardly notice it, The music that is...
BTW,
at the end credits of the 1st episode, it has 2 Daleks credited (ROY SKELTON) & i forgot the other guy's name... But i did not see any daleks in the 1st episode even though they where credited! ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SharazJek
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 889 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Roy Skelton provided the Dalek voice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1743 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
And John Scott Martin was the Dalek operator.
They trimmed the appearance, but left the credits intact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wester
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 604 Location: Brisbane
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is outrageous. What a shame these silly issues cant be worked out.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davros
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 131 Location: Skaro
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wester wrote: | This is outrageous. What a shame these silly issues cant be worked out.  |
I'm not sure of the full story but isn't this a royalities issue ...the current owner wants money for their viewing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1743 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Everything's complicated at the BBC owns the appearance of the Daleks, but the Nation estate owns the concept. Since Nation's death, his estate (managed by Hancocks) has been endeavouroing to get money in for the family. I imagine ABC would have to reach a deal with Hancocks to show the Daleks. But I don't know this to be a fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the third part, the Fourth Doctor is only mentioned to be in the vortex but no images from Shada this time.
Liz Shaw only appears briefly as a phantom. Given the fact that she only appeared in the four season 7 stories, instead of being a phantom she should have been the one to accompany the Third Doctor in the Death Zone.
Yet another terrific (yeah right) cliffhanger with the Master creeping up beind the First Doctor and Tegan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wester
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 604 Location: Brisbane
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Davros wrote: | | Wester wrote: | This is outrageous. What a shame these silly issues cant be worked out.  |
I'm not sure of the full story but isn't this a royalities issue ...the current owner wants money for their viewing? |
yes, more money, we'd all like that. But this seems to be going on for ages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeYates
Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 98
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:17 pm Post subject: I wanna be like |
|
|
| Did i noticed there was no crediting for Mike Yates or Liz Shaw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davros
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 131 Location: Skaro
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This story was created to celebrate the 20 year of Doctor Who ...was there a 30th and what was done for it? ...the 40th was meant to be a BIG deal but I can't recall the BBC doing anything big about?
2014 will be 50 years of Doctor Who ...they better make this one a celebration!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dave
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 605 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I gave this a very good, because I love it and have for 20 years or so. Seeing Pertwee and Troughton playing off one another again is a real treat, and having the Brigadier and Sarah Jane along too was great.
I've been thinking alot this week about what a pity it was that Tom didn't want to be a part of this, but I'm not sure it would have worked so well with him there. I just can't imagine his Doctor working well with any of the others, or taking a minor part in favour of Davisons' Doctor. I know these things would have been left to the writers, but it's quite possibly a good thing Baker declined.
Yet, I still find myself wishing he was there... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sulp Niar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 715 Location: Where You Only Live Thirteen Times
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's the go with the Raston Warrior Robot? Is it one of the Doctor's old enemies that we've never seen, or is it an ancient "guardian" of the Death Zone that Rassilon put in to protect himself should anyone play the game too well (if he did, then why would he do the ring trap thing I guess...). Just interests me. The music in that scene was rocking and different to anything I had heard in Doctor Who before. It also worked, strangely.
It seems odd that the First Doctor is the one to work out the "he who wins loses" puzzle, considering he is the first incarnation. What does that say about his later incarnations - that they're stupid?
I was initially disappointed at Tom's absence but by the end of it I was very glad he wasn't there, because he wouldn't have been able to restrain himself, trying to steal the limelight from Davison. Same with the Dalek - initially disappointed that it was "cut" but then glad because the episode actually works better without that scene, since it is so superfluous.
The Cybermen are crap in this story. Damn pity that is, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 1743 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Raston Warrior Robot is unexplained - whether it was there since the Dark Times or scooped in by Borusa. The helmet is impressive, but generally I didn't like it - especially the ultra-crap 'it moves to fast to see' effects.
There's a really nonsensical convention in Doctor Who whereby certain characters are known to be smart, so they must always be smarter than everyone around them. The Doctor's 1st incarnation is shown as smarter than nis next two in The Three Doctors (perhaps because Hartnell's illness meant he couldn't do anything but a few studio-bound scenes, so he's smarter than the others in The Five Doctors as well. He, of course, is the least experienced of the incarnations present, and hence each of the others should be as or more able to solve the puzzles.
The only possible explanation for it is this: As the earliest incarnation, the 1st Doctor's taps into his later incarnations minds telepathically and uses their metal powers to supplement his own. (And if you believe that, get you cheque beook out and take a look at this bridge...)
The Cybermen are used very much as generic monsters by Eric Saward - see also his short story Birth of a Renegade in the BBC 20th Anniversary special magazine for Cybermen as generic monsters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dave
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 605 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did those Cybermen in the final episode sound like cyber-chipmunks to anyone else, or was that just my TV?
As for the knowledge thing, I think I have a reasonable explanation. I think each regeneration is such a completely different personality that there's almost a degree of 'amnesia' involved, in a way. I'd say that whereas the Doctor can certainly remember things he may have done in a different incarnation, he may not be able to recall his thought processes at the time, as they were comletely alien to those of his present incarnation.
This helps explain why the 3rd Doctor knew venusian akido (or karate) whereas other incarnations didn't seem to, and explains other minor inconsistencies. Each new incarnation is a totally new personality, and although having memories from earlier incarnations, doesn't necessarily share all the knowledge they might have had. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Theta Sigma
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 3901
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Davros wrote: | This story was created to celebrate the 20 year of Doctor Who ...was there a 30th and what was done for it? ...the 40th was meant to be a BIG deal but I can't recall the BBC doing anything big about?
|
The 30th anniversary was celebrated with a two part skit Dimensions in Time made for charity for Children In Need featuring all the surviving Doctors (including a brief cameo by Tom). I only read the scripts of it http://homepages.bw.edu/~jcurtis/Scripts/DIT/intro.html as it was not allowed to broadcast outside the UK and can't be officiallly released due to its status as a charity production.
As for the 40th, the BBC basically celebrated it with the Richard E. Grant webcast of Scream of the Shalka which was intended to try out Doctor Who in a different direction with the absence of a TV series. However this was before anyone knew there was going to be a new series. The announcement of the new series spoiled the limelight for Shalka even before its debut in November 2003.
| Sulp Niar wrote: | | I was initially disappointed at Tom's absence but by the end of it I was very glad he wasn't there, because he wouldn't have been able to restrain himself, trying to steal the limelight from Davison. |
If you would pardon me but that is an unfair assessment since it would have been the director who would have decided who gets the limelight. Given the fact that director Peter Moffatt had directed Tom in State of Decay he would have an idea of how to handle Tom. The story is crap the moment the Third Doctor and Sarah were paired together. I remember one review of the DVD saying that Tom's absence made sure the story was not as good as it is suppose to be. The reviewer even says that The Five Doctors felt more like a grandmother's 70th birthday party.
Peter Davison would have lost the limelight if Robert Holmes' Six Doctors storyline had been accepted as it focuses way too much on the Second Doctor. This is clearly evident when Holmes reused elements of the Six Doctors for The Two Doctors as Colin Baker is treated more as a backseat passenger than as the lead actor.
| dave wrote: | | This helps explain why the 3rd Doctor knew venusian akido (or karate) whereas other incarnations didn't seem to, and explains other minor inconsistencies. |
I seem to recall the Fourth Doctor did use the venusian akido in Masque of Mandragora.
Last edited by Theta Sigma on Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|